In a startling revelation, a former head of royal security has claimed 

that he warned the British Royal Family before Princess Diana embarked on a holiday with businessman Mohamed al Fayed. 

This disclosure adds a new layer to the complex narrative surrounding the late Princess of Wales and her final days. 

The former security chief, who played a critical role in overseeing Diana’s safety during her time as a royal, 

has come forward to assert that he had deep concerns about the vacation and the company she would be keeping. 

His warning, which allegedly went unheeded, raises questions about the Royal Family’s awareness of Diana’s personal decisions during 

that period and the measures that were, or were not, taken to ensure her safety.

Mohamed al Fayed, the billionaire Egyptian businessman and father of Dodi Fayed, who tragically died alongside Diana in the infamous 1997 Paris car crash, had grown close to Diana in the months leading up to their deaths. The two were frequently seen together, sparking rumors of a romantic relationship, a notion that fascinated the public and fueled endless speculation. Their fateful holiday in the summer of 1997, which included time spent on al Fayed’s luxury yacht cruising the Mediterranean, became a focal point for the media. Paparazzi hounded the couple, leading to heightened public interest in their every move.

The former security head’s warning reportedly came as a result of growing concerns over the increased attention that Diana’s association with al Fayed was attracting. The media frenzy surrounding their relationship had reached fever pitch, with photographers going to extreme lengths to capture intimate moments between the pair. The security official believed that this level of intrusion posed a significant threat to Diana’s safety. Moreover, al Fayed’s immense wealth and controversial reputation added to the concerns, as he was often viewed with suspicion by some members of the British establishment.

Al Fayed, who owned the prestigious Harrods department store and the Ritz Hotel in Paris, had long sought to ingratiate himself with the British aristocracy and the Royal Family. However, his efforts were met with resistance, particularly after his unsuccessful attempts to secure British citizenship. His association with Diana, therefore, was seen by some as an attempt to gain further social and political standing. The former security head likely took this into consideration when voicing his concerns, fearing that Diana’s involvement with al Fayed could expose her to risks beyond mere paparazzi harassment.

Despite these warnings, it appears that the Royal Family did not take significant action to intervene in Diana’s decision to holiday with al Fayed. This could have been due to a variety of reasons. By 1997, Diana had already divorced Prince Charles and was no longer officially a member of the Royal Family. Her independence meant that she had more freedom to make personal decisions without the constraints of royal protocol. However, this also meant that her security arrangements were not as robust as they had been during her marriage, a factor that could have contributed to the tragedy that later unfolded.

The former security head’s warning sheds light on the internal tensions that likely existed within the royal apparatus regarding Diana’s evolving personal life. After her divorce, she became a more unpredictable figure, often defying royal traditions and engaging in relationships and activities that were seen as controversial. Her involvement with Mohamed al Fayed, a man whose background and ambitions were viewed skeptically by the British elite, was emblematic of this newfound independence. The Royal Family, keen to distance themselves from scandal, may have chosen to remain passive, allowing Diana to make her own decisions, even if those decisions carried potential risks.

The tragic outcome of that holiday is well known. On August 31, 1997, Diana, Dodi Fayed, and their driver, Henri Paul, died in a car crash in the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in Paris while being pursued by paparazzi. The event sent shockwaves around the world, sparking an outpouring of grief and an international reckoning over the role of the media in Diana’s life and death. In the years since, conspiracy theories have proliferated, with many pointing to Mohamed al Fayed’s claims that the crash was orchestrated by the British establishment as part of a larger plot. Though official investigations have concluded that the crash was an accident, largely caused by the driver’s intoxication and the aggressive pursuit by paparazzi, doubts persist in the minds of some.

The former security head’s recent comments will undoubtedly fuel further speculation about whether Diana’s death could have been prevented. His assertion that he warned the Royal Family before Diana’s holiday with al Fayed suggests that there were concerns within royal circles about the potential dangers she faced. Whether these concerns were fully communicated to Diana, or if she chose to disregard them, remains unclear. What is evident is that this warning, in hindsight, underscores the fragility of Diana’s position in her final months—caught between her desire for a life of personal freedom and the ever-present dangers posed by her global fame.

The Royal Family has largely remained silent on the specifics of Diana’s relationship with Mohamed al Fayed and the circumstances surrounding her death. However, revelations like those made by the former security chief raise difficult questions about the extent to which they could have or should have intervened in her life after the divorce. As the public continues to reflect on Diana’s legacy, this new information adds another dimension to the complex and often painful narrative of her final days, reminding the world of the vulnerabilities faced by one of the most famous women in history.

 Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.