This month has brought unusual happenings, especially within the royal family, as both King Charles and Kate, the Princess of Wales, find themselves in the same London hospital. 

The monarchy is experiencing what some might call its most significant health crisis since the infamous incident involving spoiled lobster thermidor. 

However, what raises eyebrows even more is the absence of Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, who have not visited their mother during her hospitalization.

Kate was admitted to the London Clinic for abdominal surgery 12 days ago, which means it has been just as long since her three young children have had the chance to see her. 

The day after news of her surgery broke, Prince William was spotted leaving the hospital’s back entrance in his $268,000 electric Audi, 

having set aside his work commitments to focus on being a full-time dad during this challenging period. Reports from both the Sun and the Daily Mail confirm that he has been visiting Kate daily, which, while commendable, raises the question: Where are their children?

The absence of not just the children, but also Kate’s devoted parents, Carole and Michael Middleton, and her close siblings, Pippa Matthews and James Middleton, is equally perplexing. James, who has openly discussed his struggles with severe depression, has previously shared how Kate supported him during his toughest moments, highlighting the strong family bonds that exist. Given this background, it’s surprising that the children have not been brought in to see their mother, particularly when they could do so privately, as the media has agreed to refrain from photographing outside the hospital to allow Kate some peace during her recovery.

The rationale behind the decision to keep the children away, as reported by the Sun, is that William and Kate want to make the situation feel as normal as possible for the youngsters. This approach makes sense on weekdays when routine and normalcy are essential for children. However, this logic falters when considering the weekend that just passed, during which the children remained at their grandparents’ $7 million estate in Bucklebury, engaging in activities that seem distant from the emotional support a visit with their mother would provide.

While their time with the Middletons may involve indulging in treats and the typical spoiling that comes with doting grandparents, one must wonder if this truly compares to the comfort and reassurance of a hug from their mother, especially in such uncertain times. The distance from the hospital to their home at Adelaide Cottage is a mere 45-minute drive, which further complicates the narrative that logistics are a barrier to family reunion.

What makes the situation even more bewildering is the contrasting narrative often portrayed about the Waleses as devoted parents who prioritize their children’s presence in their lives. The couple reportedly takes extensive time off during school holidays—around 19 weeks a year—to engage in bonding activities with their children, promoting a family-first philosophy. A recent statement from a royal aide indicated that their motto during this challenging time is “100 percent family first, day job second.” This begs the question: how does this philosophy reconcile with the decision to keep their children from visiting Kate in the hospital?

Understandably, children might find the idea of visiting a parent in a hospital intimidating and distressing. Yet, the benefits of seeing their mother, coupled with the reassurance that she is on the mend, likely outweigh the fears associated with hospital visits. The argument put forth by the Daily Mail’s royal editor that royals typically do not visit each other in the hospital seems outdated, especially when considering recent royal interactions. For instance, King Charles made a point to visit his daughter-in-law at the hospital, and Queen Camilla made multiple visits to her husband within a single day.

At a time when family unity should be at the forefront, the Waleses seem to be deviating from the expected norms of royal behavior, creating a dissonance with their previously established image as hands-on, caring parents. With public scrutiny always present, it would be prudent for them to reassess their priorities and perhaps consider the emotional well-being of their children, ensuring that they have the opportunity to see their mother during her recovery.

In closing, it may be time for the royal family to reevaluate their approach to familial connections during times of crisis. While the intention to maintain a sense of normalcy for the children is admirable, the emotional support and comfort of visiting a loved one in the hospital should not be overlooked. With the ongoing complexities of royal life, it could be beneficial for the Waleses to blend tradition with a more modern approach to family dynamics, fostering closer ties and emotional connections during challenging times.

 Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.