Diana’s sisters, Lady Sarah McCorquodale and Lady Jane Fellowes, 

have found themselves at the center of criticism as their public stance on the ongoing feud 

between Prince Harry and Prince William has often seemed inconsistent and, at times, downright contradictory. 

The two sisters, who are also the closest family members to the late Princess Diana, 

have been criticized for what some view as a two-faced approach: at certain moments, they have shown support for Harry and his wife Meghan Markle, 

while at other times, they have sided with William and his wife, Catherine, the Princess of Wales. 

This shifting loyalty has not only raised eyebrows within the royal circle but also fueled the already intense public scrutiny surrounding the royal family’s internal dynamics. 

Some critics argue that, far from helping to mediate or heal the rift between the brothers, Diana’s sisters have, on occasion, intensified the discord, almost unwittingly stoking the flames of the feud.

The criticisms directed at Diana’s sisters primarily stem from their perceived inconsistency in public support. As members of the royal family, both Sarah and Jane are deeply connected to the history and inner workings of the monarchy. Yet, despite their proximity to the royal fold, their actions have left the public confused about where their true loyalties lie. On one hand, there have been instances where Diana’s sisters have expressed empathy and understanding for Harry’s position, acknowledging the pain and struggles he has endured. For example, they have made public statements that appeared to support Harry and Meghan, even voicing concerns about the pressures and difficulties they have faced as a result of their royal roles. Given the history of tension within the royal family, especially regarding the treatment of Harry and Meghan by the press and public, it might seem natural for Diana’s sisters, as family members who are undoubtedly sensitive to the emotions of those closest to Diana, to stand by Harry and his wife. After all, they too were deeply affected by Diana’s tragic death and might have felt a sense of solidarity with Harry, who has been vocal about the pain he experienced from the loss of his mother, as well as the emotional toll of being a royal.

However, this support has not been constant. There have been several occasions where both sisters have been seen in more public displays of support for William and Kate, especially in the context of their roles as future King and Queen consort. Their actions in these moments have seemed to suggest that they are not fully aligned with Harry and Meghan’s stance on the royal family and their concerns about how they have been treated. This dual approach has been interpreted by many as a form of fence-sitting or political maneuvering, as if the sisters are trying to remain neutral in what is undoubtedly a highly charged and divisive family feud. But this neutrality—or perceived neutrality—has not been without its consequences. Many have accused them of being “two-faced” for failing to take a clear stance, and this ambivalence has only served to further fuel the media frenzy surrounding the royal rift.

In some cases, Diana’s sisters have even been accused of exacerbating the tension between the brothers. Reports have surfaced suggesting that, at certain points, they may have made comments or taken actions that contributed to the already simmering conflict between Harry and William. Whether intentional or not, these actions have been interpreted as siding with one brother or the other in ways that do not appear entirely neutral. For instance, when Diana’s sisters publicly appeared to support William and Kate, it sent a message that perhaps Harry and Meghan were not being entirely fair in their grievances against the royal family. Conversely, when they expressed sympathy for Harry’s struggles, it allowed the public to question whether the royal family, particularly William, was complicit in the turmoil that Harry and Meghan experienced.

The royal family has been steeped in controversy and tension for years, but the feud between William and Harry is arguably one of the most prominent and publicized in recent history. The brothers, once close, have become embroiled in a series of disputes that have played out in the media, much to the chagrin of their family and supporters. While it is understandable that Diana’s sisters might feel a sense of loyalty to both brothers, the perception that they are playing both sides has done little to ease the public’s curiosity or the brothers’ ongoing conflict. In fact, their inconsistent approach may have added fuel to the fire, further dividing public opinion and intensifying the scrutiny faced by both William and Harry.

The challenge for Diana’s sisters, of course, is the delicate balance they must strike between family loyalty and public perception. On one hand, they undoubtedly want to support their nieces and nephews, but on the other, they also have to be mindful of the broader implications of their actions. As members of the royal family, they are aware of the intricate politics and alliances that play out behind closed doors. They understand the need to maintain appearances and uphold the monarchy’s public image. However, this attempt to walk the fine line between supporting Harry and Meghan, while also backing William and Kate, has made their position appear more complex and less transparent.

Critics have argued that Diana’s sisters could have taken a more active role in facilitating dialogue between the brothers, rather than contributing to the media circus that has surrounded the feud. Instead of playing a passive or ambivalent role, they could have used their unique position as family members to bridge the gap between William and Harry. After all, they have firsthand experience of the pain and dysfunction that can arise within the royal family, having witnessed the turmoil that Diana herself endured. With their insight into the family dynamics, they may have been able to offer counsel or, at the very least, avoid making public statements that further alienated the brothers from one another.

In some respects, the sisters’ actions have been seen as indicative of the larger issues that have plagued the royal family for years—issues of communication, loyalty, and maintaining a united front. As the royal family continues to navigate these turbulent waters, the criticism of Diana’s sisters highlights the difficulty of maintaining familial harmony while being thrust into the public eye. For many, their fluctuating support of Harry and William raises questions about the authenticity of their loyalties and whether they are complicit in deepening the rift between the brothers.

In conclusion, Diana’s sisters have found themselves in the crossfire of the royal family’s ongoing conflicts, facing accusations of inconsistency and, at times, contributing to the discord between Prince Harry and Prince William. Their attempts to support both sides of the family, while understandable given their close ties to both brothers, have only served to complicate the situation and fuel the narrative that they are being two-faced. Whether or not this perception is fair, the reality is that their actions have contributed to the already tense atmosphere surrounding the royal family, and the public is left questioning their true role in the family’s complicated dynamics.

 Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.